Written by: Scott
Derrickson, C. Robert Cargill
Directed by: Scott
Derrickson
Starring: Ethan Hawke,
Juliet Rylance, Clare Foley
Don't you hate it when you
watch a movie, and it's pretty good, but as you're watching it and
then when you're mulling it over later, you realize that it could
have been great instead? I almost think that Scott Derrickson and
his co-writer, C. Robert Cargill, felt the same way. It seems like
they had the script for that great movie, and then some dipshit
studio suit went and smeared Generico Brand Asshole Jelly ™ all
over it, so you can sort of see glimpses of the good stuff through
all the crap the distributor glopped on to make sure the stupid
tweenieboppers wouldn't get confused because there wasn't any rap on
the soundtrack. It seems unlikely to me that they would have gotten right the things they got right, and yet gotten wrong the things they got wrong without someone with far less talent giving the orders.
Ok, I'm really not as down
on this movie as the above paragraph makes it seem. It just really
pisses me off that Hollywood so frequently ruins a filmmaker's vision
and turns a great movie into a mediocre one because they're afraid to
take a damn chance. This is the story of Ellison Oswalt (a name
Cargill says is an homage to Harlan Ellison and Patton Oswalt, so
whatever these guys may be, clearly they're not stupid), a true crime
writer who is facing a situation of publish or perish. Sure, he
could just write textbooks for the rest of his life, but who wants to
do a boring shit job when they could do something they love? Problem
is, it's been ten years since his last hit and he needs to get
another book on the shelves pronto or start compiling notes for
Physics for Poets.
So
he uproots his family and moves them to a house where an entire
family was hung from a tree in the backyard. All except the young
daughter, who disappeared. Of course, he tells his family they're
simply moving to the town where it happened, because if they knew
he'd moved them into the murder house, the next autograph he'd be
signing would be on divorce papers (I really hate the way this plot
convention is handled here and in a hundred other similar movies.
When she finds out where they are, Ellison's wife flips her shit, and
of course she's completely right, except that no supernatural stuff
has happened yet. She's right by default, because it's a horror
movie, but were this a real life situation she would just be acting
like a shrill, unreasonable bitch. I'd love, just once, to see the
character who just happens to be right about the horrible danger
everyone is in have some motivation for it other than being
argumentative for drama's sake). The local sheriff (played by
douchebag extraordinaire Fred Thompson) is none too happy about the
situation either. Not only does he think what Ellison is doing is in
extremely poor taste, he's no fan of the way the writer portrays
policemen in his books.
While
moving some stuff up to the attic one day, Ellison discovers a box of
8mm film canisters. When he sets up the projector in his study, his
reaction is not what most people's would be. The films turn out to
feature the murders of not only the family who he plans to write
about, but many other families as well, all seemingly murdered by the
same killer over the course of decades. As I said, most people would
be horrified, but Ellison realizes he's hit an extremely rich vein.
Now, instead of one dead family, he can write a book about a serial
killer who has been murdering his way across the country since the
60's. One of the local deputies, hopeful of a credit in the book and
a little fame of his own, lends a hand with the research. But when
Ellison's son Trevor starts sleepwalking and acting like he's
possessed, and a face that appears in all of the films
starts looking at
Ellison when he enhances the images on his computer, it becomes clear
that thinking up a punchy title for the new book is the least of
Ellison's problems. And then he starts talking to one of his other
contacts, a professor who specializes in ancient cults and deities,
and things get really unpleasant...
This
is probably the closest thing we're ever going to get to a Ramsey
Campbell movie. For those of you unfamiliar (and you really should
do something about that), Campbell is one of the greatest horror
authors in the world. He's a true successor to H.P. Lovecraft, and
even improves on the sense of impending dread and helplessness in an
uncaring world of immense and implacable supernatural evil pioneered
by the Old Providence Ghoul. Never have I read another author who is
so relentlessly bleak, who is such a talented
emotional terrorist. You just feel icky after reading a Ramsey
Campbell story.
Campbell's
books aren't especially violent, even when something horrible happens
he's a master of using suggestion instead of graphic description, and
in his hands that's somehow so much worse. I don't think he could
write a happy ending if he tried. The nicest
thing of his I've read was about a serial killer who murders people
with a goddamn blowtorch. Another theme in his books (and
considering his family background it's not surprising why) is
domestic decay. The only time the families in his books don't become
completely unglued by the end is when they start out that way in the
first place. And his protagonists are often writers who stumble into
a cosmic horror that threatens everything they know. Author
inadvertently moves crumbling family into the path of a pagan deity
bent on devouring his daughter and killing everyone else. That's the
basic plot of at least three of his books I can think of off the top
of my head.
You
may have figured out from all the gushing that Ramsey Campbell is one
of my favorite authors, so you can understand my disappointment that
such a close approximation to his style was so very nearly worthy of
the association. Most of it's there. Even the downer ending, which
really surprised the hell out of me considering how dumbed down so
much of the rest of it was. The worst mistake I think they made was
giving the deity (a made-up creature named Bughuul, probably derived
from the Middle-English bugge, German
boggel-mann, and a few
other similar names that all became the now-familiar English bogey,
or boogie man) a physical presence. Or at least the physical
presence it wound up having. It looks like Abbath from Immortal.
Since the occult professor mentions Norwegian black metal at one
point, I can't imagine Derrickson doesn't know who that is or what
corpsepaint in general looks like, unless that's just a phrase he
heard on the internet and thought it sounded cool. Still, it sort of
undercuts the menace a little when at any moment you expect the
monster to start singing, “Sons of Northern Darkness”.
At
the end of the day, it's a better-than-average but frustratingly
generic spook flick that should have been way better than it is, and
insists on reminding you of that every ten minutes or so by doing
something really cool. It's worth a watch, if nothing else to see
some of the incredibly dark shit they got away with at the end. And
for a fun party game, watch it with a group and have “Blizzard
Beasts” queued up on your stereo to blast at maximum volume
whenever Bughuul pops up.
No comments:
Post a Comment